Skip to main content

Steph Spams: How 'Coco' Contrasts Real Life Through The Magic of Animation

Coco is a beautifully animated movie about family.

While plenty of live-action movies cover this same topic, there’s just something about Coco being stylized in such a way that it makes the experience better. Animated movies have a magic that just cannot be replicated in strictly real life, but it can draw upon real life. You see, movies like this are able to utilize both the fantasy of cartoon and grittiness of real life together to create a purposeful contrast that’s visually striking. For a better understanding, let’s take a closer look into specific design choices of the movie.

Coco uses artistic animation during the scene where Dante changes from his regular dog form to his spirit guide form. While Dante the dog is cartooned in proportion, the art of the animated movie gives his body a rough skin texture.  Dante’s regular dog form has little to no fur, so you are able to see much of his skin, including moles and discolored patches. His muscle movements also stand out since his fur is so thin. The color palette as well, muddy browns and pinks, makes him look like a scrappy street dog, which he is supposed to be. This realistic depiction, using a natural, realistic but bland color palette for the stray, is then contrasted when Dante turns into his spirit guide form.
Image result for coco movie dante

Dante’s spirit guide form is diverse in color palette, using bright neons against a dark body background. This is completely different from his previous form, and adds a whimsical sense of beauty to the overall art of the film. This new color palette is popping, striking even against the navy sky and orange lanterns in the land of the dead. On Dante are also free-flowing patterns which move with the character, and making up each stripe of vibrant color is obvious fur, giving this new coat a nice soft texture. No longer is he a realistic stray, but a creature of fantasy that is meant to capture the audience’s imaginations.
Related image

Live action dogs do not turn neon colors and sprout humorously small wings, they are bound by the laws of our universe. In animation, however, the possible is limitless, and artists create whatever they wish by their own rules. Even if the movie was made as live action, and CGI was used to color Dante’s new body, the vibrant colors would have still been animated in with his movements or edited in some other similar way. Through the magic of animation, we can see Dante transform into rainbow patterns, a type of magic that just can’t be captured in real life alone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Steph Spams: A Brief Look at Tim Burton's Auteur

Tim Burton has a bizarre style of imagination, his auteur, that makes his films recognizable among audiences. Burton is known well for his creepy character design, and similar types can be found in both his animated and live action movies. Edward, for example, is very thin, pale, and has long fingers, or, rather, scissors for fingers. This design captures the audience in the same way another character of his, Jack Skellington, does. Jack, while animated, shares Edward’s pale complexion, think and lanky build, and long, skinny fingers. While Jack does not have scissors for hands, they are instead bone, giving a similar sharp and exaggerated appearance. Both characters wear elaborate black outfits and have bulging eyes, or, rather, in Jack’s case, eye sockets. Both of these characters are also misunderstood by society around them, a common trait of the protagonist in all of his movies. Tim developed much of these characters, namely Jack and Edward, in school, and perhaps

Steph Spams: Why The Radio Is Important In American Graffiti

What a surprisingly good “coming of age” story. I watched American Graffiti recently, a movie set in 1962 following multiple interlocking subplots with the various characters. It’s more character driven than anything. The group splits off into their own plot lines for development during what has to be the longest night to ever sit through. In fact, the entire movie is comprised of these splitting subplots. Sometimes they overlap, influencing each other by causing some minor conflict, or moving another character’s story forward by showing up just at the right time. But, other than what feels like the occasional cameo, each character’s story seems to function independently. So, what connects them, if it isn’t exactly the plot tying them together? What seemed at first to me as the most annoying, static-blasting quality of the movie turned out to be my favorite part. The subplots can all influence each other, but outside of those quick instances, the stories tell separately. S